Value My Heart

I ran across a website set up by United States Artists. There, they quoted a survey by Urban Institute, Investing in Creativity: A Survey of the Support Structure for U.S. Artists (2003), and Rand Research in the Arts, Gifts of the Muse: Reframing the Argument about the Benefits of the Humanistic Discipline (2004).

What I establish interesting, and most likely true from my experiences of having people state me that one cannot do a life out of painting, sculpting, or writing, was that 96% of Americans said they were inspired by and highly valued fine art in their lives and communities. Oddly, though, Americans make not value the artists. Only 27% believed that people lend "a lot" to the good of society.

That is strange, indeed. Our chap citizens value art, but not the enactment of creating that art.

Here's a quotation mark from the web page referenced above:

"Further interview information from the survey reflects a strong sentiment in the cultural community that society makes not value art-making arsenic legitimate work worthy of compensation. Many comprehend the devising of fine art as a frivolous or recreational pursuit."

To see the website: http://www.unitedstatesartists.org.

I think Iodine shouldn't be surprised by these statistics. After all, supposedly over 85% of Americans believe in God. But many of them don't desire anyone talking about it.

I inquire how much of the artistic chase is not valued by the community. I also inquire if this devaluing of artistic and musical enterprises will increase as we take "unnecessary" social classes from our schools, like fine art and music lessons.

I also inquire what we, as a society, can make to change this. Today, people utilize the valuable computing machine tools to make art. Some of the work done by these programmes (and the 1s using the programs) is quite creative. But should these creative activities be more than valuable because they were done using a computing machine program? Should they be less valuable?

Some authors utilize writing tools that aid them acquire their books started. The authorship programmes aid them put up sketches and chapters. Should authors who utilize these sorts of tools be valued more than or less than authors who make not?

Should a author who take a firm stands on using pen and paper be held in higher respect than one who only utilizes a computer?

Personally, I happen it sad that people can claim to love art, but not value the artist. Perhaps if we set fine art and music back into the schoolrooms of America, there might be a alteration in attitude. Yes, I believe that would make wonderments for children and parents today, if drawing, painting, and a potter's wheel were re-introduced into the classrooms. I believe if our immature people were all bucked up to sing or drama an instrument, it would assist them see that the individual who takes music as a calling is a valuable portion of society.

Children today make not acquire adequate originative time. They pass far too many hours in study, but are still lacking behind those from other states in academics. Could it be that taking fine art and music out of the schoolroom have made our children less able to think? And to feel?